Blockchain-Enabled Electronic Health Record Model for Managing Patients Vital Data and Medical Reports

Authors

  • Aditi Sharma, PhD Research Scholar, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Chitkara University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University, Punjab, India
  • Rajesh Kumar Kaushal, PhD Professor, Department of Computer Applications, Chitkara University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University, Punjab, India
  • Naveen Kumar, PhD Professor, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Chitkara University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University, Punjab, India
  • Ekkarat, Boonchieng, PhD Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30953/bhty.v9.455

Keywords:

Blockchain, electronic health record, Hyperledger Fabric, hyperledger Caliper, performance evaluation, remote patient monitoring

Abstract

The evolution of IoT in healthcare has transformed patient care, with the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) enabling remote patient monitoring (RPM) through body sensors that track vitals such as heart rate, oxygen saturation, and body temperature. These devices generate huge volumes of data, raising concerns about security, privacy, and scalability. Existing blockchain-based Electronic Health Record (EHR) solutions mostly focus on textual data and lack integration of high-dimensional medical images like X-rays, MRIs, and CT scans, which are vital for diagnosis and treatment. To overcome these limitations, this study proposes a blockchain-enabled secure storage and retrieval framework, including medical imaging. The system is built using Hyperledger Fabric in an IoT-enabled RPM environment. IoMT sensors collect patient vitals, and implement smart contracts using Node.js. The model adopts a multi-organization setup with two organizations, a single channel, and RAFT consensus to ensure data consistency and high performance. In testing, 1200 transactions were executed at different Transactions per second rates. Results showed that throughput remained close to the send rate up to 90 TPS, peaking at 117.04 TPS when configured at 150 TPS, after which it declined. Importantly, no transactions failed, demonstrating system reliability. Latency ranged between 0.21 and 2.24 seconds, while read operations consistently maintained 0.01 seconds across all rounds.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Katoon PM, Turukmane AV. Interoperable blockchain network for

healthcare data using Fabric, Ethereum, and IPFS. Discov Artif

Intell. 2025;5(1):1–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-025-00564-7

2. Afzal I, Parah SA, Hurrah NN, Song OY. Secure patient data transmission

on resource constrained platform. Multimed Tools Appl.

2024;83(5):15001–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-09139-3

3. Shen Y, Yu J, Zhou J, Hu G. Twenty-five years of evolution and

hurdles in electronic health records and interoperability in medical

research. J Med Internet Res. 2025;27(1):59024–49. https://doi.

org/10.2196/59024

4. Tertulino R, Antunes N, Morais H. Privacy in electronic health

records: a systematic mapping study. J Public Health. 2024;32(3):

435–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-022-01795-z

5. Alomar D, Almashmoum M, Eleftheriou I, The impact of patient

access to electronic health records on health care engagement: systematic

review. J Med Internet Res. 2024;26:473–88. https://doi.

org/10.2196/56473

6. Carlos Ferreira J, Elvas LB, Correia R, Mascarenhas M. Enhancing

EHR interoperability and security through distributed ledger technology.

Healthcare (Basel). 2024;12:1967–87. https://doi.org/10.3390/

healthcare12191967

7. Kasa PSP. A distributed and scalable system for remote patient monitoring

using cloud-based architecture. IJIRCCE. 2024;12(8):10706–17.

8. Hathaliya J, Sharma P, Tanwar S. Blockchain-based remote patient

monitoring in healthcare 4.0. In 9th international conference on

advanced computing (IACC). IEEE; 2019. p. 87–91.

9. Wang Y, Zhang A, Zhang P, Wang H. Cloud-assisted EHR sharing

with security and privacy preservation via consortium blockchain.

IEEE Access. 2019;7:136704–19.

10. Kayikci S, Khoshgoftaar TM. Blockchain meets machine learning:

a survey. J Big Data. 2024;11(1):9. https://doi.org/10.1186/

s40537-023-00852-y

11. Charles WM, Delgado BM. Health datasets as assets: blockchain-

based valuation and transaction methods. Blockchain Healthc

Today. 2022;5(10):953–66. https://doi.org/10.30953/bhty.v5.222

12. Cheikhrouhou O, Mershad K, Jamil F, Mahmud R, Koubaa A, Moosavi

SR. A lightweight blockchain and fog-enabled secure remote

patient monitoring system. Internet of Things. 2023;22:100691.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2023.100691

13. Husnain G, Ullah Z, Mohmand MI, Qadir M, Alzahrani KJ, Ghadi

YY, et al. HealthChain: a blockchain-based framework for secure

and interoperable electronic health records (EHRs). IET Commun.

2024;18(19):1451–73.

14. Dobre D, Vasilățeanu A. Electronic health record authentication and

authorization using Blockchain and QR codes. Procedia Comput Sci.

2024;239(4):1784–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2024.06.358

15. Carter G, White D, Nalla A, Shahriar H, Sneha S. Toward application

of blockchain for improved health records management and

patient care. Blockchain Healthc Today. 2019;2(7):240–52. https://doi.

org/10.30953/bhty.v2.37

16. Upadrista V, Nazir S, Tianfield H. Secure data sharing with blockchain

for remote health monitoring applications: a review. J

Reliab Intell Environ. 2023;9(3):349–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/

s40860-023-00204-w

17. Garg S, Kaushal RK, Kumar N. A novel design and performance assessment

of a blockchain-powered remote patient monitoring system. SN

Comput Sci. 2024;5(7):849. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-024-03151-2

18. Carter G, Shahriar H, Sneha S. Blockchain-based interoperable electronic

health record sharing framework. In IEEE Annual Computer

Software and Applications Conference 2019. p. 452–60.

19. Kaushal RK, Kumar N, Kukreja V, Boonchieng E. Hyperledger

fabric-based remote patient monitoring solution and performance

evaluation. Peer-to-Peer Netw Appl. 2025;18(3):105. https://doi.

org/10.1007/s12083-025-01921-0

20. Tahir NUA, Rashid U, Hadi HJ, Ahmad N, Cao Y, Alshara MA,

et al. Blockchain-based healthcare records management framework:

enhancing security, privacy, and interoperability. Technologies. 2024;

12(9):168. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies12090168

21. Ullah A, Ullah Z, Rizvi SS, Gul L, Kwon SJ. Toward blockchain-

based electronic health record management with fine-grained

attribute-based encryption and decentralized storage mechanisms. Sci

Rep. 2025;15(1):542–67. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-17875-5

22. Hasnain M, Albogamy FR, Alamri SS, Ghani I, Mehboob B. The

Hyperledger fabric as a Blockchain framework, preserves the security

of electronic health records. Front Public Health. 2023;11(4):787–99.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1272787

23. Salleh MIM, Abdullah R, Zakaria N. Evaluating the effects of

electronic health records system adoption on the performance of

Malaysian health care providers. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak.

2021;21:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-021-01447-4

24. Carter G, Chevellereau B, Shahriar H, Sneha S. Openpharma blockchain

on FHIR: an interoperable solution for read-only health records

exchange through blockchain and biometrics. Blockchain Healthc

Today. 2020;3:1–11. https://doi.org/10.30953/bhty.v3.120

25. Çodur S, Erkayman B. Blockchain technology from the supply chain

perspective: a systematic literature review. Spectr Decis Mak Appl.

2025;2(1):268–85. https://doi.org/10.31181/sdmap21202520

26. Kaushal RK, Kumar N. Exploring hyperledger caliper benchmarking

tool to measure the performance of blockchain based solutions. In:

2024 11th international conference on reliability, infocom technologies

and optimization IEEE; 2024. p. 1–6.

27. Bigini G, Lattanzi E. Toward the interplanetary health layer for the

internet of medical things with distributed ledgers and storage. IEEE

Access. 2022;10:82883–95.

28. Schweitzer M, Flórez K, Steger B, Baumgarten D, Romano V, Augustin

M. Integrating a novel eye imaging system into clinical practice:

an open-source DICOM simulation platform. Stud Health Technol

Inform. 2023;301:198–203. https://doi.org/10.3233/SHTI230039

[AQ15]

[AQ16]

[AQ17]

12 Citation: Blockchain in Healthcare Today 2026, 8: 455 - https://doi.org/10.30953/bhty.v8.455

(page number not for citation purpose)

A. Sharma et al.

29. Kumar R, Marchang N, Tripathi R. Distributed off-chain storage of

patient diagnostic reports in healthcare system using IPFS and blockchain

COMSNETS. IEEE, 2020. p. 1–5.

30. Jayadev V, Moradpoor N, Petrovski A. Assessing the performance of

ethereum and hyperledger fabric under DDoS attacks for cyber-physical

systems. In: Proceedings of the 19th international conference on

availability, reliability and security. 2024. p. 1–6.

31. Battisti JHF, Batista VE, Koslovski GP, Pillon MA, Miers CC,

Marques MA, et al. Performance analysis of the Raft consensus algorithm

on Hyperledger Fabric and Ethereum on the cloud. In: 2023

IEEE. 2023. p. 155–60.

32. Pradhan NR, Singh AP, Verma S, Kavita, Kaur N, Roy DS, et al.

A novel blockchain-based healthcare system design and performance

benchmarking on a multi-hosted testbed. Sensors. 2022;22(9):

3449–69. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22093449

33. Capocasale V, Gotta D, Perboli G. Comparative analysis of permissioned

blockchain frameworks for industrial applications. Blockchain

Res Appl. 2023;4(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcra.2022.100113

34. Khan MM, Khan FS, Nadeem M, Khan TH. Scalability and efficiency

analysis of hyperledger fabric and private ethereum in smart

contract execution. Computers. 2025;14(4):132–66. https://doi.org/

10.3390/computers14040132

35. Yuan F, Huang X, Zheng L, Wang L, Wang Y. The evolution and

optimization strategies of a PBFT consensus algorithm for consortium

blockchains. Information. 2025;16(4):268–309. https://doi.

org/10.3390/info16040268

36. Ucbas Y, Eleyan A, Hammoudeh M, Alohaly M. Performance and

scalability analysis of ethereum and Hyperledger Fabric. IEEE Access.

2023;11(3):67156–67. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3291618

37. Díaz Á, Kaschel H. Scalable electronic health record management

system using a dual-channel blockchain hyperledger fabric. Systems.

2023;11(7):346–69. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11070346

38. Kumar Kaushal R, Kumar N, Flammini F. Enhancing data integrity

in higher education: a blockchain-based student complaint system using Hyperledger fabric. Int J Comput Digit Syst. 2024;16(1):

1387–97. https://doi.org/10.12785/ijcds/1601102

Published

2026-05-04

How to Cite

Sharma, A., Kaushal, R. K., Naveen Kumar Chitkara, & Ekkarat Boonchieng. (2026). Blockchain-Enabled Electronic Health Record Model for Managing Patients Vital Data and Medical Reports. Blockchain in Healthcare Today, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.30953/bhty.v9.455