Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues of Metaverse-Enabled Healthcare
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30953/bhty.v8.456Keywords:
Immersive virtual spaces, metaverse, role-playing games, social implications, virtual reality, virtual spacesAbstract
Metaverse is heralded by some as the next iteration of the internet. It offers three-dimensional, immersive virtual spaces, where users, represented as avatars, can synchronously work, play, interact, and transact. Initially
developed within the realm of massive multiplayer online role-playing games, the metaverse now extends into
sectors such as music, entertainment, retail, real estate, and, more recently, healthcare. Users engage in the
metaverse using augmented reality or virtual reality (AR/VR) headsets that interoperate with other sensory
devices to integrate biofeedback and multimodal data streams.1
In this article, the authors offer a conceptual synthesis and anticipatory policy analysis grounded in a narrative review of current trends reported in
public-facing news reports as well as interdisciplinary sources from bioethics, law, digital-health policy, and
science-and-technology studies. There are seven key ethical, legal, and social issue areas for consideration in
the delivery of metaverse-enabled healthcare. We additionally issue a call to action to explore the metaverse
through a bioethics lens. The authors begin by providing a primer on the metaverse, including the various
forces shaping its development. Next, the authors describe what distinguishes the metaverse from other digital-health technologies and illustrate emerging use cases for the metaverse. We then outline what we consider
the most pressing ethical issues raised as the metaverse matures in parallel with (or in advance of) policy guidance and regulation. Finally, we conclude with a research agenda that treats the metaverse as a serious topic
of normative and empirical inquiry and argue for sustained engagement from diverse user communities to
support its ethical design and development.
Downloads
References
Ford, T. J., Buchanan, D. M., Azeez, A., Kaloiani, I. & Bandeira, I. D. Taking modern psychiatry into the metaverse: Integrating augmented, virtual, and mixed reality technologies into psychiatric care. Front Digit Health 5, (2023).
Massetti, M. & Chiariello, G. A. The metaverse in medicine. Eur Heart J Suppl. 25, 104–107 (2023).
Sandrone, S. Medical education in the metaverse. Nat Med 28, 2456–2457 (2022).
Gómez-Zará, D., Schiffer, P. & Wang, D. The promise and pitfalls of the metaverse for science. Nat Hum Behav 7, 1237–1240 (2023).
Short, J., Williams, E. & Christie, B. The social psychology of telecommunications. No Title https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1130282268777950720 (1976).
Biocca, F., Harms, C. & Burgoon, J. K. Toward a more robust theory and measure of social presence: Review and suggested criteria. Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 12, 456–480 (2003).
Hennig-Thurau, T. Social interactions in the metaverse: Framework, initial evidence, and research roadmap. J Acad Mark Sci 51, 889–913 (2023).
Greenwold, S. Spatial Computing. (Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Media Arts and Sciences, 2003).
Bailenson, J. N. Nonverbal Overload: A Theoretical Argument for the Causes of Zoom Fatigue. Technol Mind Behav 2, (2021).
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Digital Health and Software as a Medical Device (SaMD). (2023).
European Commission. European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 on Harmonised Rules on Artificial Intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act). (2024).
U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology. AI Risk Management Framework. (2023).
Williford, D. Dreamscapes of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power ed. by Sheila Jasanoff and Sang-Hyun Kim. Technol. Cult. 60, 1110–1112 (2019).
Friedman, B., Kahn, P. H., Borning, A. & Huldtgren, A. Value Sensitive Design and Information Systems. in Early engagement and new technologies: Opening up the laboratory (eds Doorn, N., Schuurbiers, D., Van De Poel, I. & Gorman, M. E.) vol. 16 55–95 (Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 2013).
Nissenbaum, H. Privacy as contextual integrity. Wash Rev 79, 119 (2004).
Madary, M. & Metzinger, T. K. Real virtuality: A code of ethical conduct. Recommendations for good scientific practice and the consumers of VR-technology. Front. Robot. AI 3, 180932 (2016).
Slater, M. & Sanchez-Vives, M. V. Enhancing our lives with immersive virtual reality. Front. Robot. AI 3, 74 (2016).
Stephenson, N. Snow Crash. (Penguin UK, 1994).
Ball, M. The Metaverse: And How It Will Revolutionize Everything. (Liveright Publishing, 2022).
Narula, H. Virtual Society: The Metaverse and the New Frontiers of Human Experience. (Crown Currency, 2022).
McKinsey & Company. Value Creation in the Metaverse. https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/mckinsey-digital/our-insights/value-creation-in-the-metaverse.
Takahashi, D. The DeanBeat: Epic graphics guru Tim Sweeney foretells how we can create the open Metaverse. VentureBeat https://venturebeat.com/games/the-deanbeat-epic-boss-tim-sweeney-makes-the-case-for-the-open-metaverse/ (2016).
Lessig, L. Code: And Other Laws of Cyberspace. (ReadHowYouWant. com, 2009).
Plantin, J.-C., Lagoze, C., Edwards, P. N. & Sandvig, C. Infrastructure studies meet platform studies in the age of Google and Facebook. New Media Soc. 20, 293–310 (2018).
Egliston, B. & Carter, M. ‘The metaverse and how we’ll build it’: The political economy of Meta’s Reality Labs. New Media Soc. 14614448221119785 (2022) doi:10.1177/14614448221119785.
Zuboff, S. The age of surveillance capitalism. in Social theory re-wired 203–213 (Routledge, 2023).
Benrimoh, D., Chheda, F. D. & Margolese, H. C. The best predictor of the future—the metaverse, mental health, and lessons learned from current technologies. JMIR Ment. Health 9, e40410 (2022).
Grandner, M. A. et al. Performance of a multisensor smart ring to evaluate sleep: in-lab and home-based evaluation of generalized and personalized algorithms. Sleep 46, zsac152 (2023).
Lee, J. P. et al. Encoding of multi-modal emotional information via personalized skin-integrated wireless facial interface. Nat. Commun. 15, 530 (2024).
Wachter, S. & Mittelstadt, B. A right to reasonable inferences: re-thinking data protection law in the age of big data and AI. Colum Bus Rev 494 (2019).
Koivisto, J. & Hamari, J. The rise of motivational information systems: A review of gamification research. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 45, 191–210 (2019).
Kurtzman, G. W. et al. Social Incentives and Gamification to Promote Weight Loss: The LOSE IT Randomized, Controlled Trial. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 33, 1669–1675 (2018).
Chow, C. Y. et al. Can games change children’s eating behaviour? A review of gamification and serious games. Food Qual. Prefer. 80, 103823 (2020).
Abdul Rahim, M. I. & Thomas, R. H. Gamification of Medication Adherence in Epilepsy. Seizure 52, 11–14 (2017).
Maheu-Cadotte, M.-A. et al. Effectiveness of serious games and impact of design elements on engagement and educational outcomes in healthcare professionals and students: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol. BMJ Open 8, e019871 (2018).
Thomas, T. H., Sivakumar, V., Babichenko, D., Grieve, V. L. B. & Klem, M. L. Mapping Behavioral Health Serious Game Interventions for Adults With Chronic Illness: Scoping Review. JMIR Serious Games 8, e18687 (2020).
Tang, J. S. Y., Chen, N. T. M., Falkmer, M., Bӧlte, S. & Girdler, S. A systematic review and meta-analysis of social emotional computer based interventions for autistic individuals using the serious game framework. Res. Autism Spectr. Disord. 66, (2019).
Martinez, K., Menéndez-Menéndez, M. I. & Bustillo, A. Awareness, Prevention, Detection, and Therapy Applications for Depression and Anxiety in Serious Games for Children and Adolescents: Systematic Review. JMIR Serious Games 9, e30482 (2021).
Menin, A., Torchelsen, R. & Nedel, L. An Analysis of VR Technology Used in Immersive Simulations with a Serious Game Perspective. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 38, 57–73 (2018).
Ghoman, S. K. & Schmölzer, G. M. The RETAIN Simulation-Based Serious Game—A Review of the Literature. Healthcare 8, 3 (2019).
Thomason, J. Metaverse, token economies, and non-communicable diseases. Glob. Health J. 6, 164–167 (2022).
Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R. & Nacke, L. From game design elements to gamefulness: defining ‘gamification’. in Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments 9–15 (ACM, Tampere Finland, 2011). doi:10.1145/2181037.2181040.
Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. The ‘What’ and ‘Why’ of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior. Psychol. Inq. 11, 227–268 (2000).
Marques, M. M. et al. The behaviour change technique ontology: transforming the behaviour change technique taxonomy v1. Wellcome Open Res. 8, 308 (2024).
Fogg, B. J. Persuasive technology: using computers to change what we think and do. Ubiquity 2002, 2 (2002).
Lindner, P., Miloff, A., Zetterlund, E., Andersson, G. & Carlbring, P. Attitudes Toward and Familiarity With Virtual Reality Therapy Among Practicing Cognitive Behavior Therapists: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study in the Era of Consumer VR Platforms. Front. Psychol. 10, (2019).
Martens, M. A. et al. It feels real: physiological responses to a stressful virtual reality environment and its impact on working memory. J. Psychopharmacol. Oxf. Engl. 33, 1264 (2019).
Yee, N. & Bailenson, J. The Proteus effect: The effect of transformed self-representation on behavior. Hum. Commun. Res. 33, 271–290 (2007).
Riva, G., Baños, R. M., Botella, C., Mantovani, F. & Gaggioli, A. Transforming experience: the potential of augmented reality and virtual reality for enhancing personal and clinical change. Front. Psychiatry 7, 164 (2016).
Liu, W., Andrade, G., Schulze, J., Doran, N. & Courtney, K. E. Using Virtual Reality to Induce and Assess Objective Correlates of Nicotine Craving: Paradigm Development Study. JMIR Serious Games 10, e32243 (2022).
Owens, M. E. & Beidel, D. C. Can Virtual Reality Effectively Elicit Distress Associated with Social Anxiety Disorder? J. Psychopathol. Behav. Assess. 2, 296–305 (2015).
Diemer, J., Lohkamp, N., Mühlberger, A. & Zwanzger, P. Fear and physiological arousal during a virtual height challenge--effects in patients with acrophobia and healthy controls. J. Anxiety Disord. 37, 30–39 (2016).
Goudman, L. et al. Virtual Reality Applications in Chronic Pain Management: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JMIR Serious Games 10, e34402 (2022).
Van Der Kruk, S. R., Zielinski, R., MacDougall, H., Hughes-Barton, D. & Gunn, K. M. Virtual reality as a patient education tool in healthcare: A scoping review. Patient Educ. Couns. 105, 1928–1942 (2022).
Winter, C. et al. Immersive virtual reality during gait rehabilitation increases walking speed and motivation: a usability evaluation with healthy participants and patients with multiple sclerosis and stroke. J. NeuroEngineering Rehabil. 18, 68 (2021).
Noecker, A. M. et al. Stereo-EEG-guided network modulation for psychiatric disorders: Interactive holographic planning. Brain Stimulat. 16, 1799–1805 (2023).
Checcucci, E. et al. Metaverse Surgical Planning with Three-dimensional Virtual Models for Minimally Invasive Partial Nephrectomy. Eur. Urol. S0302-2838(23)03015–4 (2023) doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2023.07.015.
Fuller, A., Fan, Z., Day, C. & Barlow, C. Digital twin: enabling technologies, challenges and open research. IEEE Access 8, 108952–108971 (2020).
Viceconti, M., Henney, A. & Morley-Fletcher, E. In silico clinical trials: how computer simulation will transform the biomedical industry. Int. J. Clin. Trials 3, 37–46 (2016).
Wang, G. Development of metaverse for intelligent healthcare. Nat Mach Intell 4, 922–929 (2022).
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Foundational Research Gaps and Future Directions for Digital Twins. 26894 https://www.nap.edu/catalog/26894 (2023) doi:10.17226/26894.
Al‐Saud, L. M. et al. Feedback and motor skill acquisition using a haptic dental simulator. Eur. J. Dent. Educ. 21, 240–247 (2017).
Williams, M. A., McVeigh, J., Handa, A. I. & Lee, R. Augmented reality in surgical training: a systematic review. Postgrad. Med. J. 96, 537–542 (2020).
Khan, M. N. R., Lippert, K. & Cloutier, R. J. A Systems-oriented Approach to Medical Education Incorporates Virtual Patients and Gamification. in 2023 27th International Conference on Information Technology (IT) 1–5 (2023). doi:10.1109/IT57431.2023.10078624.
Kyaw, B. M. et al. Virtual Reality for Health Professions Education: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis by the Digital Health Education Collaboration. J. Med. internetRes. 21, e12959 (2019).
Valdez, V. B. & Javier, S. P. Digital Divide: From a Peripheral to a Core Issue for all SDGs. in Reduced Inequalities (eds Leal Filho, W. et al.) 1–14 (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2020). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-71060-0_107-1.
Prainsack, B. & Forgó, N. Why paying individual people for their health data is a bad idea. Nat. Med. 28, 1989–1991 (2022).
Altundas, S. & Karaarslan, E. Cross-platform and Personalized Avatars in the Metaverse: Ready Player Me Case. in Digital Twin Driven Intelligent Systems and Emerging Metaverse (eds Karaarslan, E., Aydin, Ö., Cali, Ü. & Challenger, M.) 317–330 (Springer Nature Singapore, Singapore, 2023). doi:10.1007/978-981-99-0252-1_16.
Cho, M. K. & Martinez-Martin, N. Epistemic Rights and Responsibilities of Digital Simulacra for Biomedicine. Am. J. Bioeth. 23, 43–54 (2023).
Chesney, T., Coyne, I., Logan, B. & Madden, N. Griefing in virtual worlds: causes, casualties and coping strategies. Inf. Syst. J. 19, 525–548 (2009).
Wagg, D. J., Worden, K., Barthorpe, R. J. & Gardner, P. Digital Twins: State-of-the-Art and Future Directions for Modeling and Simulation in Engineering Dynamics Applications. ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertain. Eng. Syst. Part B Mech. Eng. 6, 030901 (2020).
Floridi, L. The Ethics of Information. (Oxford University Press (UK), 2013).
Taylor, L. What is data justice? The case for connecting digital rights and freedoms globally. Big Data Soc. 4, 205395171773633 (2017).
Gordon, J.-S. & Pasvenskiene, A. Human rights for robots? A literature review. AI Ethics 1, 579–591 (2021).
Mayernik, M. S. Technical standards within socio‐technical systems: An Annual Review of Information Science and Technology ( ARIST ) paper. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. asi.25017 (2025) doi:10.1002/asi.25017.
Roesner, F. & Kohno, T. Security and privacy for augmented reality: Our 10-year retrospective. in VR4Sec: 1st International Workshop on Security for XR and XR for Security (2021).
Darling, K. Extending legal protection to social robots: The effects of anthropomorphism, empathy, and violent behavior towards robotic objects. in Robot Law (eds Calo, R., Froomkin, A. M. & Kerr, I.) (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2016). doi:10.4337/9781783476732.00017.
Whitby, B. Sometimes it’s hard to be a robot: A call for action on the ethics of abusing artificial agents. Interact. Comput. 20, 326–333 (2008).
Greenwold, S. Spatial Computing. (Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Media Arts and Sciences, 2003).
Rocher, L., Hendrickx, J. M. & De Montjoye, Y.-A. Estimating the success of re-identifications in incomplete datasets using generative models. Nat. Commun. 10, 3069 (2019).
Susser, D. et al. Synthetic Health Data: Real Ethical Promise and Peril. Hastings Cent. Rep. 54, 8–13 (2024).
Ball, M. The Metaverse: And How It Will Revolutionize Everything. (Liveright Publishing, 2022).
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Foundational Research Gaps and Future Directions for Digital Twins. (2023) doi:10.17226/26894.
Singh, S. Regulation of Cross-Border Data Flow and Its Privacy in the Digital Era. NUJS J Regul Stud 9, 38 (2024).
Dove, E. S. The EU General Data Protection Regulation: Implications for International Scientific Research in the Digital Era. J. Law. Med. Ethics 46, 1013–1030 (2018).
Torous, J. et al. Characterizing the clinical relevance of digital phenotyping data quality with applications to a cohort with schizophrenia. Npj Digit. Med. 1, 1–9 (2018).
Barricelli, B. R., Casiraghi, E. & Fogli, D. A Survey on Digital Twin: Definitions, Characteristics, Applications, and Design Implications. IEEE Access 7, 167653–167671 (2019).
Kostick-Quenet, K. et al. How NFTs could transform health information exchange. Science 375, 500–502 (2022).
Hardinges, J. & Wells, P. Data trusts will not be the final word on data sharing, but they might help. Public Money Manag. 39, 320–321 (2019).
Delacroix, S. & Lawrence, N. D. Bottom-up data trusts: Disturbing the ‘one size fits all’approach to data governance. Int. Data Priv. Law 9, 236–252 (2019).
Ostrom, E. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. (Cambridge university press, 1990).
Martinez-Martin, N. et al. Ethical issues in using ambient intelligence in health-care settings. Lancet Digit. Health 3, e115–e123 (2021).
Barnes, C. et al. Enabling Demonstrated Consent for Biobanking with Blockchain and Generative AI. Am. J. Bioeth. 0, 1–16.
pwc. The Future of Healthcare in the Metaverse: The latest frontier in healthtech. (2023).
Abbas, W. UAE healthcare group to launch world’s first metaverse hospital in October. Khaleej Times https://www.khaleejtimes.com/health/uaes-first-hospital-in-metaverse-to-launch-in-october.
The Health Care Metaverse Is More Than a Virtual Reality. BCG Global https://www.bcg.com/publications/2023/reaping-the-benefits-of-the-healthcare-metaverse (2023).
Holčapek, T., Šolc, M. & Šustek, P. Telemedicine and the standard of care: a call for a new approach? Front. Public Health 11, 1184971 (2023).
Shachar, C., Engel, J. & Elwyn, G. Implications for telehealth in a postpandemic future: regulatory and privacy issues. Jama 323, 2375–2376 (2020).
Bell-Aldeghi, R. et al. Determinants of the Cost-Effectiveness of Telemedicine: Systematic Screening and Quantitative Analysis of the Literature. Telemed. E-Health 29, 1078–1087 (2023).
Roine, R., Ohinmaa, A. & Hailey, D. Assessing telemedicine: a systematic review of the literature. Cmaj 165, 765–771 (2001).
De Guzman, K. R., Snoswell, C. L., Caffery, L. J. & Smith, A. C. Economic evaluations of videoconference and telephone consultations in primary care: A systematic review. J. Telemed. Telecare 30, 3–17 (2024).
Mantovani, A., Leopaldi, C., Nighswander, C. M. & Di Bidino, R. Access and reimbursement pathways for digital health solutions and in vitro diagnostic devices: current scenario and challenges. Front. Med. Technol. 5, 1101476 (2023).
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Kristin M. Kostick-Quenet, PhD, Vasiliki Rahimzadeh, PhD
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright of their work, with first publication rights granted to Blockchain in Healthcare Today (BHTY). Read the full Copyright Statement.
Funding data
-
National Institute of Mental Health
Grant numbers R01MH125958
